حَدَّثَنَا قُتَيْبَةُ بْنُ سَعِيدٍ الثَّقَفِيُّ، وَمَالِكُ بْنُ عَبْدِ الْوَاحِدِ الْمِسْمَعِيُّ، - وَهَذَا حَدِيثُهُ - أَنَّ ابْنَ أَبِي عَدِيٍّ، حَدَّثَهُمْ عَنْ مُحَمَّدِ بْنِ إِسْحَاقَ، عَنْ عَبْدِ اللَّهِ بْنِ أَبِي بَكْرٍ، عَنْ عَمْرَةَ، عَنْ عَائِشَةَ، رضى الله عنها قَالَتْ لَمَّا نَزَلَ عُذْرِي قَامَ النَّبِيُّ صلى الله عليه وسلم عَلَى الْمِنْبَرِ فَذَكَرَ ذَاكَ وَتَلاَ - تَعْنِي الْقُرْآنَ - فَلَمَّا نَزَلَ مِنَ الْمِنْبَرِ أَمَرَ بِالرَّجُلَيْنِ وَالْمَرْأَةِ فَضُرِبُوا حَدَّهُمْ ‏.‏
Translation
Narrated Aisha, Ummul Mu'minin

When my vindication came down, the Prophet (ﷺ) mounted the pulpit and mentioned that, and recited the Qur'an. Then when he came down from the pulpit he ordered regarding the two men and the woman, and they were given the prescribed punishment.

Comment

Hadith Commentary: Prescribed Punishment for Adultery

This narration from Sunan Abi Dawud 4474 describes the implementation of ḥadd punishment for zinā (unlawful sexual intercourse). The Prophet's public sermon and Qur'anic recitation demonstrate the gravity of this offense in Islamic law.

Legal Procedure and Evidence

The Prophet's approach shows that ḥudūd punishments require proper judicial process, not vigilante justice. The public announcement indicates that such punishments serve as deterrents while ensuring transparency.

Classical scholars note that the "two men and woman" likely refers to a case where either both men committed zinā with one woman, or it involved a married woman and two unmarried men - with different punishments applying based on marital status.

Scholarly Interpretation

Imam al-Nawawi explains that the pulpit announcement emphasizes the public interest aspect of ḥudūd - serving as both punishment and lesson for the community.

Ibn Qudāmah notes that the phrase "prescribed punishment" here refers to either flogging for unmarried offenders or rajm (stoning) for married ones, depending on their marital status as determined by the court.

Contemporary Relevance

Modern scholars emphasize that the strict evidentiary requirements for implementing ḥudūd (four eyewitnesses to the actual act or confession) make their application extremely rare in proper Islamic judicial systems.