حَدَّثَنَا حَفْصُ بْنُ عُمَرَ، عَنْ شُعْبَةَ، عَنْ أَبِي عَوْنٍ، عَنِ الْحَارِثِ بْنِ عَمْرِو بْنِ أَخِي الْمُغِيرَةِ بْنِ شُعْبَةَ، عَنْ أُنَاسٍ، مِنْ أَهْلِ حِمْصَ مِنْ أَصْحَابِ مُعَاذِ بْنِ جَبَلٍ أَنَّ رَسُولَ اللَّهِ صلى الله عليه وسلم لَمَّا أَرَادَ أَنْ يَبْعَثَ مُعَاذًا إِلَى الْيَمَنِ قَالَ ‏"‏ كَيْفَ تَقْضِي إِذَا عَرَضَ لَكَ قَضَاءٌ ‏"‏ ‏.‏ قَالَ أَقْضِي بِكِتَابِ اللَّهِ ‏.‏ قَالَ ‏"‏ فَإِنْ لَمْ تَجِدْ فِي كِتَابِ اللَّهِ ‏"‏ ‏.‏ قَالَ فَبِسُنَّةِ رَسُولِ اللَّهِ صلى الله عليه وسلم ‏.‏ قَالَ ‏"‏ فَإِنْ لَمْ تَجِدْ فِي سُنَّةِ رَسُولِ اللَّهِ صلى الله عليه وسلم وَلاَ فِي كِتَابِ اللَّهِ ‏"‏ ‏.‏ قَالَ أَجْتَهِدُ رَأْيِي وَلاَ آلُو ‏.‏ فَضَرَبَ رَسُولُ اللَّهِ صلى الله عليه وسلم صَدْرَهُ وَقَالَ ‏"‏ الْحَمْدُ لِلَّهِ الَّذِي وَفَّقَ رَسُولَ رَسُولِ اللَّهِ لِمَا يُرْضِي رَسُولَ اللَّهِ ‏"‏ ‏.‏
Translation

Mu'adh bin Jabal said that when the Messenger of Allah (ﷺ) sent him to the Yemen... He then narrated the rest of the tradition to the same effect.

Comment

The Office of the Judge (Kitab Al-Aqdiyah)

Sunan Abi Dawud 3593 - Commentary by Classical Scholars

Hadith Context

This narration references the famous incident when Prophet Muhammad (ﷺ) appointed Mu'adh ibn Jabal as judge and governor of Yemen, inquiring about the sources he would use for judgment.

Scholarly Commentary

Classical scholars explain that Mu'adh responded he would judge by: 1) Allah's Book (Quran), 2) Sunnah of the Prophet, and 3) Ijtihad (independent reasoning) when no clear text exists. The Prophet approved this methodology, establishing the fundamental principles of Islamic jurisprudence.

Imam Nawawi comments that this hadith demonstrates the hierarchy of legal sources in Islam and validates scholarly reasoning (ijtihad) within proper boundaries. Ibn Qayyim emphasizes that this establishes the judge's duty to use multiple legal tools while maintaining primary allegiance to divine revelation.

Legal Implications

This tradition forms the basis for Islamic judicial methodology, showing that judges must be learned in Quran, Hadith, and principles of juristic reasoning. It also indicates that qualified judges may exercise ijtihad when facing novel cases not explicitly covered in primary texts.