Bulugh al-Maram
Bulugh al-Maram 36
وَعَنْ عَبْدِ اَللَّهِ بْنِ عَمْرٍو رَضِيَ اَللَّهُ عَنْهُمَا -فِي صِفَةِ اَلْوُضُوءِ- قَالَ: { ثُمَّ مَسَحَ - صلى الله عليه وسلم -بِرَأْسِهِ, وَأَدْخَلَ إِصْبَعَيْهِ اَلسَّبَّاحَتَيْنِ فِي أُذُنَيْهِ, وَمَسَحَ بِإِبْهَامَيْهِ ظَاهِرَ أُذُنَيْهِ. } أَخْرَجَهُ أَبُو دَاوُدَ, وَالنَّسَائِيُّ, وَصَحَّحَهُ اِبْنُ خُزَيْمَة َ 1 .1 - صحيح. رواه أبو داود (135)، والنسائي (1/88) من طريق عمرو بن شعيب، عن أبيه، عن جده، وله شواهد أخرى، إلا أن في هذا الحديث عند أبي داود لفظة لا تصح كما في "الأصل". وصحح الحديث ابن خزيمة (174) ولكن ليس عنده محل الشاهد.
Abdullah ibn Amr (may Allah be pleased with them both), describing the ablution, said: Then he (peace and blessings be upon him) wiped his head, inserted his two index fingers into his ears, and wiped the outside of his ears with his two thumbs. Abu Dawud and al-Nasa'i reported it, and Ibn Khuzaymah graded it authentic. 1 — Abu Dawud (135) and al-Nasa'i (1/88) reported it through Amr ibn Shu'ayb, from his father, from his grandfather. It has other corroborating reports, but Abu Dawud’s version of this hadith contains a wording that is not authentic, as explained in “the Original.” Ibn Khuzaymah graded the hadith authentic (174), but his version does not contain the point used as evidence here.
Translation notes
إلا أن في هذا الحديث عند أبي داود لفظة لا تصح كما في "الأصل".
The Arabic note says that one word in Abu Dawud’s version is not authentic but does not identify that word within this unit; it points to ‘the Original’ for the explanation.
Which specific wording is being identified as unauthentic in the cited work?