Sunan Ibn Majah
Sunan Ibn Majah 2046
حَدَّثَنَا أَبُو بَكْرِ بْنُ أَبِي شَيْبَةَ، حَدَّثَنَا عَبْدُ اللَّهِ بْنُ نُمَيْرٍ، عَنْ مُحَمَّدِ بْنِ إِسْحَاقَ، عَنْ ثَوْرٍ، عَنْ عُبَيْدِ بْنِ أَبِي صَالِحٍ، عَنْ صَفِيَّةَ بِنْتِ شَيْبَةَ، قَالَتْ حَدَّثَتْنِي عَائِشَةُ، أَنَّ رَسُولَ اللَّهِ ـ صلى الله عليه وسلم ـ قَالَ " لاَ طَلاَقَ وَلاَ عَتَاقَ فِي إِغْلاَقٍ " .
Unreviewed translation. All hadiths in this collection are available in five languages. Titles and introductions may remain in Arabic.
Abu Bakr ibn Abi Shaybah narrated to us: ʿAbdullah ibn Numayr narrated to us, from Muhammad ibn Ishaq, from Thawr, from ʿUbayd ibn Abi Salih, from Safiyyah bint Shaybah, who said: ʿAishah told me that the Messenger of Allah said: ‘There is no divorce and no emancipation in a state of ighlaq.’
Notes and open questions — unreviewed
Ighlaq is retained as a transliterated term because it has been explained as coercion, intense anger, or a state in which one is mentally shut off.
أَنَّ رَسُولَ اللَّهِ ـ صلى الله عليه وسلم ـ قَالَ " لاَ طَلاَقَ وَلاَ عَتَاقَ فِي إِغْلاَقٍ " .
The term إِغْلاَقٍ has several interpretations, including coercion or extreme anger that closes off judgment; this report does not define it.
Should ighlaq remain transliterated, or should one interpretation such as coercion be used?