Enjoining what is good and forbidding what is evil Sunan Ibn Majah 4013

Arabic hadith text
حَدَّثَنَا أَبُو كُرَيْبٍ، حَدَّثَنَا أَبُو مُعَاوِيَةَ، عَنِ الأَعْمَشِ، عَنْ إِسْمَاعِيلَ بْنِ رَجَاءٍ، عَنْ أَبِيهِ، عَنْ أَبِي سَعِيدٍ الْخُدْرِيِّ، وَعَنْ قَيْسِ بْنِ مُسْلِمٍ، عَنْ طَارِقِ بْنِ شِهَابٍ، عَنْ أَبِي سَعِيدٍ الْخُدْرِيِّ، قَالَ أَخْرَجَ مَرْوَانُ الْمِنْبَرَ فِي يَوْمِ عِيدٍ فَبَدَأَ بِالْخُطْبَةِ قَبْلَ الصَّلاَةِ فَقَالَ رَجُلٌ يَا مَرْوَانُ خَالَفْتَ السُّنَّةَ أَخْرَجْتَ الْمِنْبَرَ فِي هَذَا الْيَوْمِ وَلَمْ يَكُنْ يُخْرَجُ وَبَدَأْتَ بِالْخُطْبَةِ قَبْلَ الصَّلاَةِ وَلَمْ يَكُنْ يُبْدَأُ بِهَا ‏.‏ فَقَالَ أَبُو سَعِيدٍ أَمَّا هَذَا فَقَدْ قَضَى مَا عَلَيْهِ سَمِعْتُ رَسُولَ اللَّهِ ـ صلى الله عليه وسلم ـ يَقُولُ ‏"‏ مَنْ رَأَى مِنْكُمْ مُنْكَرًا فَاسْتَطَاعَ أَنْ يُغَيِّرَهُ بِيَدِهِ فَلْيُغَيِّرْهُ بِيَدِهِ فَإِنْ لَمْ يَسْتَطِعْ فَبِلِسَانِهِ فَإِنْ لَمْ يَسْتَطِعْ فَبِقَلْبِهِ وَذَلِكَ أَضْعَفُ الإِيمَانِ ‏"
Translation
It was narrated that Abu Sa’eed Al-Khudri said

“Marwan broughtoutthe pulpit on the day of ‘Eid, and he started with the sermonbeforethe prayer. A man said: ‘O Marwan, you have gone against theSunnah.You have brought out the pulpit on this day, and it was notbroughtout before, and you have started with the sermon before theprayer,and this was not done before.’ Abu Sa’eed said: ‘As forthis man, hehas done his duty. I heard the Messenger of Allah (ﷺ)say: ‘Whoeveramong you sees an evil action and can change it withhis hand (bytaking action), let him change it with his hand. If hecannot do that,then with his tongue (by speaking out); and if hecannot do that, thenwith his heart (by hating it and feeling that itis wrong), and thatis the weakest of faith.’”

Commentary

Overview & Central Theme

This hadith, recorded by Ibn Majah in the Book of Tribulations (Kitab al-Fitan), encapsulates the prophetic mandate for enjoining good and forbidding evil (al-amr bil-ma'ruf wa al-nahi 'an al-munkar). The central theme is the graded hierarchy of corrective action—by hand, tongue, or heart—emphasizing that every believer bears a responsibility to oppose wrongdoing according to their capacity. The narrative contextualizes this principle within a specific historical incident involving Marwan ibn al-Hakam, the governor of Medina, who altered the established Sunnah of the Eid prayer by delivering the sermon before the prayer and using a pulpit. A companion's objection, affirmed by Abu Sa'id al-Khudri, illustrates the practical application of this duty and underscores the importance of vocal dissent when action is impossible.

Context & Linguistic Insights

The incident occurred during the caliphate of Mu'awiyah (r. 41-60 AH) when Marwan governed Medina. The companion who objected, identified in other narrations as Abu Sa'id al-Khudri himself, addressed Marwan directly, saying, "You have gone against the Sunnah." The phrase "gone against the Sunnah" (khalafta al-Sunnah) is a powerful legal indictment, signifying a deviation from the established prophetic practice. Linguistically, the hadith's key terms include: "munkar" (evil/objectionable act), which denotes anything rejected by Islamic law and sound nature; "yughayyiru" (to change), implying active rectification; and "da'f al-iman" (weakest of faith), which classifies the internal rejection of evil as the minimal level of belief, highlighting that even passive disapproval is a form of faith, albeit the weakest. The Arabic word "yad" (hand) metaphorically represents physical power or authority, while "lisan" (tongue) signifies verbal admonition, and "qalb" (heart) denotes inner conviction.

Key Scholarly Insights & Legal Benefits

  • The hadith establishes a legal obligation (fard kifayah) to correct evil, with the method determined by one's ability and the risk of greater harm; scholars like Imam al-Nawawi clarify that "hand" applies to rulers and those with authority, "tongue" to scholars and public figures, and "heart" to the general populace.
  • It underscores the principle of gradualism in Islamic jurisprudence: when complete removal of evil is impossible, one must still strive to minimize it, a concept echoed in the maxim "removing the greater of two harms" (dar' al-mafasid).
  • The companion's objection to Marwan, despite his political authority, demonstrates that criticizing rulers for clear violations of the Sunnah is permissible and encouraged, provided it is done with wisdom and without inciting chaos—a view upheld by the majority of Ahl al-Sunnah, as opposed to the Murji'ah who advocated silent obedience.
"Whoever among you sees an evil, let him change it with his hand; if he cannot, then with his tongue; if he cannot, then with his heart, and that is the weakest of faith." — Imam al-Nawawi comments: "This hadith is a fundamental principle in commanding good and forbidding evil, and it outlines the degrees of action according to capability, and the heart's disapproval is obligatory upon everyone, and there is no excuse for abandoning it."

Daily Life & Spiritual Application

In contemporary life, this hadith empowers Muslims to act against injustice proportionally. When witnessing corruption in one's workplace, community, or family, one must first assess the ability to effect change directly (by hand) through lawful means—such as reporting to authorities or using legitimate power. If that is not feasible, one should speak out (by tongue) with wisdom and respect, offering counsel or raising awareness. When even that is impossible due to fear of greater harm, the believer must at least harbor sincere disapproval in the heart, accompanied by supplication for guidance. This internal stance is not passive resignation but a spiritual act of faith that preserves one's integrity. The hadith also teaches humility: acknowledging one's limitations while never abandoning the moral responsibility to strive for justice, thereby embodying the prophetic balance of courage and prudence.