Jami' at-Tirmidhi
Jami` at-Tirmidhi 2534
حَدَّثَنَا هَنَّادٌ، حَدَّثَنَا أَبُو الأَحْوَصِ، عَنْ عَطَاءِ بْنِ السَّائِبِ، عَنْ عَمْرِو بْنِ مَيْمُونٍ، عَنْ عَبْدِ اللَّهِ بْنِ مَسْعُودٍ، نَحْوَهُ بِمَعْنَاهُ وَلَمْ يَرْفَعْهُ . وَهَذَا أَصَحُّ مِنْ حَدِيثِ عَبِيدَةَ بْنِ حُمَيْدٍ وَهَكَذَا رَوَى جَرِيرٌ وَغَيْرُ وَاحِدٍ عَنْ عَطَاءِ بْنِ السَّائِبِ وَلَمْ يَرْفَعُوهُ . حَدَّثَنَا قُتَيْبَةُ، حَدَّثَنَا جَرِيرٌ، عَنْ عَطَاءِ بْنِ السَّائِبِ، نَحْوَ حَدِيثِ أَبِي الأَحْوَصِ وَلَمْ يَرْفَعْهُ أَصْحَابُ عَطَاءٍ وَهَذَا أَصَحُّ .
Unreviewed translation. All hadiths in this collection are available in five languages. Titles and introductions may remain in Arabic.
A report from Abdullah ibn Masud gives similar wording in meaning but does not attribute it to the Prophet. Abu Isa considered this more accurate than the version narrated by Ubaidah ibn Humayd. He noted that Jarir and more than one other transmitter from Ata ibn al-Saib likewise reported it without attributing it to the Prophet. In another route, Qutaybah reported from Jarir, from Ata, a report similar to Abu al-Ahwas’s; Ata’s companions did not attribute it to the Prophet, and Abu Isa said this was more accurate.
Notes and open questions — unreviewed
This source unit is a chain and attribution note; it refers back to the preceding report but does not repeat its full wording. ‘Did not attribute it to the Prophet’ renders lam yarfaʿūhu.