Jami' at-Tirmidhi

Jami` at-Tirmidhi 1051

The Book on Jana''iz (Funerals) Search within the hadiths
Jami` at-Tirmidhi 1051
Arabic hadith text

حَدَّثَنَا عَلِيُّ بْنُ حُجْرٍ، وَأَبُو عَمَّارٍ قَالاَ أَخْبَرَنَا الْوَلِيدُ بْنُ مُسْلِمٍ، عَنْ عَبْدِ الرَّحْمَنِ بْنِ يَزِيدَ بْنِ جَابِرٍ، عَنْ بُسْرِ بْنِ عُبَيْدِ اللَّهِ، عَنْ وَاثِلَةَ بْنِ الأَسْقَعِ، عَنْ أَبِي مَرْثَدٍ الْغَنَوِيِّ، عَنِ النَّبِيِّ صلى الله عليه وسلم نَحْوَهُ ‏.‏ وَلَيْسَ فِيهِ عَنْ أَبِي إِدْرِيسَ وَهَذَا الصَّحِيحُ ‏.‏ قَالَ أَبُو عِيسَى قَالَ مُحَمَّدٌ وَحَدِيثُ ابْنِ الْمُبَارَكِ خَطَأٌ أَخْطَأَ فِيهِ ابْنُ الْمُبَارَكِ وَزَادَ فِيهِ عَنْ أَبِي إِدْرِيسَ الْخَوْلاَنِيِّ وَإِنَّمَا هُوَ بُسْرُ بْنُ عُبَيْدِ اللَّهِ عَنْ وَاثِلَةَ بْنِ الأَسْقَعِ هَكَذَا رَوَى غَيْرُ وَاحِدٍ عَنْ عَبْدِ الرَّحْمَنِ بْنِ يَزِيدَ بْنِ جَابِرٍ وَلَيْسَ فِيهِ عَنْ أَبِي إِدْرِيسَ الْخَوْلاَنِيِّ وَبُسْرُ بْنُ عُبَيْدِ اللَّهِ قَدْ سَمِعَ مِنْ وَاثِلَةَ بْنِ الأَسْقَعِ ‏.‏

Translation

Unreviewed translation. All hadiths in this collection are available in five languages. Titles and introductions may remain in Arabic.

Ali ibn Hujr and Abu Ammar narrated to us: They said: al-Walid ibn Muslim informed us, from Abd al-Rahman ibn Yazid ibn Jabir, from Busr ibn Ubayd Allah, from Wathilah ibn al-Asqa', from Abu Marthad al-Ghanawi, from the Prophet (peace and blessings be upon him), a similar report, but without Abu Idris. This is the correct version. Abu Isa said: Muhammad said, 'The hadith of Ibn al-Mubarak is mistaken; Ibn al-Mubarak erred in it by adding Abu Idris al-Khawlani. Rather, it is Busr ibn Ubayd Allah from Wathilah ibn al-Asqa'. More than one narrator transmitted it this way from Abd al-Rahman ibn Yazid ibn Jabir, without Abu Idris al-Khawlani. Busr ibn Ubayd Allah did hear from Wathilah ibn al-Asqa'.'

Notes and open questions — unreviewed
  • ‏ قَالَ أَبُو عِيسَى قَالَ مُحَمَّدٌ وَحَدِيثُ ابْنِ الْمُبَارَكِ خَطَأٌ أَخْطَأَ فِيهِ ابْنُ الْمُبَارَكِ وَزَادَ فِيهِ عَنْ أَبِي إِدْرِيسَ الْخَوْلاَنِيِّ وَإِنَّمَا هُوَ بُسْرُ بْنُ عُبَيْدِ اللَّهِ عَنْ وَاثِلَةَ بْنِ الأَسْقَعِ هَكَذَا رَوَى غَيْرُ وَاحِدٍ عَنْ عَبْدِ الرَّحْمَنِ بْنِ يَزِيدَ بْنِ جَابِرٍ وَلَيْسَ فِيهِ عَنْ أَبِي إِدْرِيسَ الْخَوْلاَنِيِّ وَبُسْرُ بْنُ عُبَيْدِ اللَّهِ قَدْ سَمِعَ مِنْ وَاثِلَةَ بْنِ الأَسْقَعِ ‏.

    The compiler explicitly identifies an additional transmitter in one chain as an error and cites the other chain as correct.

    Does the translation make clear that Abu Idris's omission concerns the chain, not the hadith's wording?