Sahih al-Bukhari
Sahih al-Bukhari 2065
حَدَّثَنَا عُثْمَانُ بْنُ أَبِي شَيْبَةَ، حَدَّثَنَا جَرِيرٌ، عَنْ مَنْصُورٍ، عَنْ أَبِي وَائِلٍ، عَنْ مَسْرُوقٍ، عَنْ عَائِشَةَ ـ رضى الله عنها ـ قَالَتْ قَالَ النَّبِيُّ صلى الله عليه وسلم " إِذَا أَنْفَقَتِ الْمَرْأَةُ مِنْ طَعَامِ بَيْتِهَا، غَيْرَ مُفْسِدَةٍ، كَانَ لَهَا أَجْرُهَا بِمَا أَنْفَقَتْ، وَلِزَوْجِهَا بِمَا كَسَبَ، وَلِلْخَازِنِ مِثْلُ ذَلِكَ، لاَ يَنْقُصُ بَعْضُهُمْ أَجْرَ بَعْضٍ شَيْئًا ".
Uthman ibn Abi Shayba narrated to us: Jarir narrated to us, from Mansur, from Abu Wail, from Masruq, from Aisha, may Allah be pleased with her, who said: The Prophet, peace and blessings be upon him, said, “When a woman spends from the food of her household without acting wastefully, she receives a reward for what she spent; her husband receives a reward for what he earned; and the storekeeper receives the same. None of them diminishes the reward of another in the least.”
Translation notes
The phrase غَيْرَ مُفْسِدَةٍ is rendered as acting without waste; its exact nuance may include not spoiling or causing harm through the expenditure.
غَيْرَ مُفْسِدَةٍ
The word can suggest not spoiling or causing harm, while the witness interprets it as not being extravagant.
Which nuance is intended in this context?