عَنْ أَبِي هُرَيْرَةَ قَالَ: قَالَ رَسُولُ اللَّهِ صَلَّى اللَّهُ عَلَيْهِ وَسَلَّمَ: «مَنْ أَطَاعَنِي فَقَدْ أَطَاعَ اللَّهَ وَمَنْ عَصَانِي فَقَدْ عَصَى اللَّهَ وَمَنْ يُطِعِ الْأَمِيرَ فَقَدْ أَطَاعَنِي وَمَنْ يَعْصِ الْأَمِيرَ فَقَدْ عَصَانِي وَإِنَّمَا الْإِمَامُ جُنَّةٌ يُقَاتَلُ مِنْ وَرَائِهِ وَيُتَّقَى بِهِ فَإِنْ أَمَرَ بِتَقْوَى اللَّهِ وَعَدَلَ فَإِنَّ لَهُ بِذَلِكَ أَجْرًا وَإِنْ قالَ بغَيرِه فَإِن عَلَيْهِ مِنْهُ»
Translation

Abu Sa'id al-Khudri reported God’s Messenger as saying, “When allegiance is sworn to two caliphs kill the second of them.* Muslim transmitted it.* Some interpret ‘kill’ here as meaning to fight with. The tradition is directed against the possibility of two Caliphs holding power at the same time, even though the areas might be quite distinct.

Comment

The Offices of Commander and Qadi - Mishkat al-Masabih 3676

A commentary from the classical Islamic scholarly perspective on the prohibition of dual leadership in the Muslim community.

Textual Analysis

The hadith transmitted by Imam Muslim through Abu Sa'id al-Khudri establishes the fundamental principle of political unity in Islam. The command to "kill the second" is understood by classical scholars as the strongest possible prohibition against division in leadership.

The phrase "when allegiance is sworn to two caliphs" indicates that the prohibition applies even when both claimants have legitimate bay'ah (pledge of allegiance) from their respective followers.

Legal Interpretation

Classical jurists from all major schools agree that the Muslim Ummah cannot have two simultaneously recognized caliphs, even if they rule over geographically separate territories. This ruling preserves the unity of the Muslim community and prevents civil strife.

The instruction to "kill the second" is interpreted by most scholars as meaning to combat and resist the later claimant until unity is restored under one legitimate authority. Some jurists understand it literally when the situation leads to fitnah (civil strife) that threatens the community's stability.

Historical Context

This ruling was particularly relevant during periods of political fragmentation in Islamic history. Scholars applied this principle to resolve conflicts between competing claimants to leadership, always prioritizing the unity of the Muslim community over regional or personal interests.

The tradition serves as a constitutional principle for Islamic governance, ensuring that political authority remains unified and preventing the division that weakens the Muslim community both politically and spiritually.