عَنِ ابْنِ عَبَّاسٍ رَضِيَ اللَّهُ عَنْهُمَا عَنِ النَّبِيِّ صَلَّى اللَّهُ عَلَيْهِ وَسَلَّمَ قَالَ: «لَوْ يُعْطَى النَّاسُ بِدَعْوَاهُمْ لَادَّعَى نَاسٌ دِمَاءَ رِجَالٍ وَأَمْوَالَهُمْ وَلَكِنَّ الْيَمِينَ عَلَى الْمُدَّعَى عَلَيْهِ» . رَوَاهُ مُسْلِمٌ وَفِي «شَرْحِهِ لِلنَّوَوِيِّ» أَنَّهُ قَالَ: وَجَاءَ فِي رِوَايَةِ «الْبَيْهَقِيِّ» بِإِسْنَادٍ حَسَنٍ أَوْ صَحِيحٍ زِيَادَةٌ عَنِ ابْنِ عَبَّاسٍ مَرْفُوعًا: «لَكِنَّ الْبَيِّنَةَ على المدَّعي واليمينَ على مَنْ أنكر»
Translation

Abu Huraira told that the Prophet suggested to some people that they should swear an oath and when they hastened to do so he ordered that lots should be cast among them concerning the oath as to who should swear it. Bukhari transmitted it.

Comment

The Offices of Commander and Qadi

A commentary on the Prophetic guidance regarding oaths and dispute resolution from Mishkat al-Masabih 3768.

Contextual Analysis

This narration from Abu Huraira demonstrates the Prophet's wisdom in judicial matters. When disputants eagerly offered to swear oaths to prove their claims, the Messenger of Allah intervened to establish proper procedure.

Scholarly Interpretation

Imam al-Nawawi explains that the Prophet recognized the potential for injustice when multiple parties compete to swear oaths. By instituting casting lots, he established an impartial mechanism that prevents the stronger or more assertive party from dominating the proceedings.

Ibn Hajar al-Asqalani notes this hadith establishes the permissibility of using lots in judicial matters when no clear evidence exists, ensuring divine discretion in determining who should swear the decisive oath.

Legal Implications

This tradition forms the basis for the Islamic legal principle that when multiple claimants seek to swear an oath, the qadi should determine the order through equitable means rather than allowing chaos or favoritism.

The method of casting lots preserves the sanctity of oaths while maintaining courtroom decorum and ensuring fair access to this solemn religious act for all parties involved in litigation.