حَدَّثَنَا قُتَيْبَةُ بْنُ سَعِيدٍ، حَدَّثَنَا لَيْثٌ، ح وَحَدَّثَنَا مُحَمَّدُ بْنُ رُمْحٍ، أَخْبَرَنَا اللَّيْثُ، عَنِ ابْنِ شِهَابٍ، عَنْ عُرْوَةَ، عَنَ عَائِشَةَ، أَنَّ قُرَيْشًا، أَهَمَّهُمْ شَأْنُ الْمَرْأَةِ الْمَخْزُومِيَّةِ الَّتِي سَرَقَتْ فَقَالُوا مَنْ يُكَلِّمُ فِيهَا رَسُولَ اللَّهِ صلى الله عليه وسلم فَقَالُوا وَمَنْ يَجْتَرِئُ عَلَيْهِ إِلاَّ أُسَامَةُ حِبُّ رَسُولِ اللَّهِ صلى الله عليه وسلم ‏.‏ فَكَلَّمَهُ أُسَامَةُ ‏.‏ فَقَالَ رَسُولُ اللَّهِ صلى الله عليه وسلم ‏"‏ أَتَشْفَعُ فِي حَدٍّ مِنْ حُدُودِ اللَّهِ ‏"‏ ‏.‏ ثُمَّ قَامَ فَاخْتَطَبَ فَقَالَ ‏"‏ أَيُّهَا النَّاسُ إِنَّمَا أَهْلَكَ الَّذِينَ قَبْلَكُمْ أَنَّهُمْ كَانُوا إِذَا سَرَقَ فِيهِمُ الشَّرِيفُ تَرَكُوهُ وَإِذَا سَرَقَ فِيهِمُ الضَّعِيفُ أَقَامُوا عَلَيْهِ الْحَدَّ وَايْمُ اللَّهِ لَوْ أَنَّ فَاطِمَةَ بِنْتَ مُحَمَّدٍ سَرَقَتْ لَقَطَعْتُ يَدَهَا ‏"‏ ‏.‏ وَفِي حَدِيثِ ابْنِ رُمْحٍ ‏"‏ إِنَّمَا هَلَكَ الَّذِينَ مِنْ قَبْلِكُمْ ‏"‏ ‏.‏
Translation
Jaibir reported that a woman from the tribe of Makhzum committed theft. She was brought to Allah's Apostle (ﷺ) and she sought refuge (intercession) from Umm Salama, the wife of Allah's Apostle (ﷺ). Thereupon Allah's Apostle (ﷺ) said

By Allah, even if she were Fatima, I would have her hand cut off. And thus her hand was cut off.

Comment

The Book of Legal Punishments

Sahih Muslim 1689 - Commentary by Classical Scholars

Context of the Hadith

This statement was uttered by the Prophet Muhammad (peace be upon him) regarding a theft case involving a woman from the noble Quraysh tribe. It demonstrates the absolute equality before Islamic law, where social status provides no immunity from divinely prescribed punishments.

Scholarly Interpretation

Imam An-Nawawi explains that this hadith establishes the fundamental principle of equality in implementing legal punishments (hudud). The mention of Fatimah, the Prophet's beloved daughter, emphasizes that no one - regardless of lineage or proximity to the Prophet - is above Allah's law.

Ibn Hajar al-Asqalani notes that this narration underscores the importance of implementing hudud without discrimination, as justice in Islam is blind to social status, wealth, or family connections.

Legal Principles Derived

1. Equality before the law is a cornerstone of Islamic jurisprudence

2. Personal relationships must not interfere with judicial rulings

3. The implementation of hudud requires strict evidentiary standards and proper judicial process

4. The purpose of punishment is to establish justice and deter crime, not merely to inflict suffering