Jami' at-Tirmidhi
Jami` at-Tirmidhi 1715
حَدَّثَنَا مَحْمُودُ بْنُ غَيْلاَنَ، حَدَّثَنَا أَبُو أَحْمَدَ، حَدَّثَنَا سُفْيَانُ، عَنِ ابْنِ أَبِي لَيْلَى، عَنِ الْحَكَمِ، عَنْ مِقْسَمٍ، عَنِ ابْنِ عَبَّاسٍ، أَنَّ الْمُشْرِكِينَ، أَرَادُوا أَنْ يَشْتَرُوا، جَسَدَ رَجُلٍ مِنَ الْمُشْرِكِينَ فَأَبَى النَّبِيُّ صلى الله عليه وسلم أَنْ يَبِيعَهُمْ إِيَّاهُ . قَالَ أَبُو عِيسَى هَذَا حَدِيثٌ غَرِيبٌ لاَ نَعْرِفُهُ إِلاَّ مِنْ حَدِيثِ الْحَكَمِ . وَرَوَاهُ الْحَجَّاجُ بْنُ أَرْطَاةَ أَيْضًا عَنِ الْحَكَمِ . وَقَالَ أَحْمَدُ بْنُ الْحَسَنِ سَمِعْتُ أَحْمَدَ بْنَ حَنْبَلٍ يَقُولُ ابْنُ أَبِي لَيْلَى لاَ يُحْتَجُّ بِحَدِيثِهِ . وَقَالَ مُحَمَّدُ بْنُ إِسْمَاعِيلَ ابْنُ أَبِي لَيْلَى صَدُوقٌ وَلَكِنْ لاَ يُعْرَفُ صَحِيحُ حَدِيثِهِ مِنْ سَقِيمِهِ وَلاَ أَرْوِي عَنْهُ شَيْئًا . وَابْنُ أَبِي لَيْلَى صَدُوقٌ فَقِيهٌ وَإِنَّمَا يَهِمُ فِي الإِسْنَادِ . حَدَّثَنَا نَصْرُ بْنُ عَلِيٍّ قَالَ حَدَّثَنَا عَبْدُ اللَّهِ بْنُ دَاوُدَ عَنْ سُفْيَانَ الثَّوْرِيِّ قَالَ فُقَهَاؤُنَا ابْنُ أَبِي لَيْلَى وَعَبْدُ اللَّهِ بْنُ شُبْرُمَةَ .
Unreviewed translation. All hadiths in this collection are available in five languages. Titles and introductions may remain in Arabic.
Mahmud ibn Ghaylan reported to us from Abu Ahmad, from Sufyan, from Ibn Abi Layla, from al-Hakam, from Miqsam, from Ibn Abbas, that the polytheists wanted to buy the person of a man from among the polytheists, but the Prophet refused to sell him to them.
Abu Isa said: This hadith is gharib; we know it only through the report of al-Hakam. Al-Hajjaj ibn Arta ah also reported it from al-Hakam. Ahmad ibn al-Hasan said: I heard Ahmad ibn Hanbal say, The report of Ibn Abi Layla is not used as proof. Muhammad ibn Ismail said: Ibn Abi Layla is truthful, but his sound reports cannot be distinguished from his weak ones, and I do not transmit from him. Ibn Abi Layla is truthful and a jurist; he errs only in the chain.
Nasr ibn Ali reported to us; he said: Abdullah ibn Dawud reported to us from Sufyan al-Thawri, who said: Our jurists are Ibn Abi Layla and Abdullah ibn Shubrumah.
Notes and open questions — unreviewed
The Arabic grade is gharib, while the English witness says Hasan Gharib. The Arabic has al-Hakam; the English witness gives al-Ahkam.
هَذَا حَدِيثٌ غَرِيبٌ
The Arabic says gharib; the English witness adds hasan.
Should the grading difference be checked against the source edition?
عَنِ الْحَكَمِ
The Arabic gives al-Hakam; the English witness has al-Ahkam.
Should this name form be verified against the source edition?