Jami' at-Tirmidhi
Jami` at-Tirmidhi 1679
حَدَّثَنَا مُحَمَّدُ بْنُ عُمَرَ بْنِ الْوَلِيدِ الْكِنْدِيُّ الْكُوفِيُّ، وَأَبُو كُرَيْبٍ وَمُحَمَّدُ بْنُ رَافِعٍ قَالُوا حَدَّثَنَا يَحْيَى بْنُ آدَمَ، عَنْ شَرِيكٍ، عَنْ عَمَّارٍ يَعْنِي الدُّهْنِيَّ، عَنْ أَبِي الزُّبَيْرِ، عَنْ جَابِرٍ، أَنَّ النَّبِيَّ صلى الله عليه وسلم دَخَلَ مَكَّةَ وَلِوَاؤُهُ أَبْيَضُ . قَالَ أَبُو عِيسَى هَذَا حَدِيثٌ غَرِيبٌ لاَ نَعْرِفُهُ إِلاَّ مِنْ حَدِيثِ يَحْيَى بْنِ آدَمَ عَنْ شَرِيكٍ . قَالَ وَسَأَلْتُ مُحَمَّدًا عَنْ هَذَا الْحَدِيثِ فَلَمْ يَعْرِفْهُ إِلاَّ مِنْ حَدِيثِ يَحْيَى بْنِ آدَمَ عَنْ شَرِيكٍ وَقَالَ حَدَّثَنَا غَيْرُ وَاحِدٍ عَنْ شَرِيكٍ عَنْ عَمَّارٍ عَنْ أَبِي الزُّبَيْرِ عَنْ جَابِرٍ أَنَّ النَّبِيَّ صلى الله عليه وسلم دَخَلَ مَكَّةَ وَعَلَيْهِ عِمَامَةٌ سَوْدَاءُ . قَالَ مُحَمَّدٌ وَالْحَدِيثُ هُوَ هَذَا . قَالَ أَبُو عِيسَى وَالدُّهْنُ بَطْنٌ مِنْ بَجِيلَةَ وَعَمَّارٌ الدُّهْنِيُّ هُوَ عَمَّارُ بْنُ مُعَاوِيَةَ الدُّهْنِيُّ وَيُكْنَى أَبَا مُعَاوِيَةَ وَهُوَ كُوفِيٌّ وَهُوَ ثِقَةٌ عِنْدَ أَهْلِ الْحَدِيثِ .
Unreviewed translation. All hadiths in this collection are available in five languages. Titles and introductions may remain in Arabic.
Muhammad ibn Umar ibn al-Walid al-Kindi al-Kufi, Abu Kurayb, and Muhammad ibn Rafi reported to us, saying: Yahya ibn Adam reported to us from Sharik, from Ammar—meaning al-Duhni—from Abu al-Zubayr, from Jabir, that the Prophet entered Makkah while his standard was white.
Abu Isa said: This hadith is gharib; we know it only through the report of Yahya ibn Adam from Sharik. I asked Muhammad about this hadith, but he knew it only through the report of Yahya ibn Adam from Sharik. He said: More than one narrator reported to us from Sharik, from Ammar, from Abu al-Zubayr, from Jabir, that the Prophet entered Makkah wearing a black turban. Muhammad said: This is the hadith.
Abu Isa said: Al-Duhn is a branch of Bajilah. Ammar al-Duhni is Ammar ibn Muawiyah al-Duhni; his kunya is Abu Muawiyah. He is from Kufa and is considered trustworthy by hadith scholars.
Notes and open questions — unreviewed
The Arabic distinguishes the main report (white standard) from a variant (black turban). In the latter chain, it says ‘from Ammar, from Abu al-Zubayr’; the English witness compresses this as ‘Ammar bin Abu Az-Zubair.’
عَنْ عَمَّارٍ عَنْ أَبِي الزُّبَيْرِ عَنْ جَابِرٍ
The Arabic has two transmitters, Ammar and Abu al-Zubayr, connected by ‘from’; the English witness merges their names.
Should the English chain be checked against the source edition?