Jami' at-Tirmidhi
The Book on Food
كتاب الأطعمة عن رسول الله صلى الله عليه وسلم
Chapter 1
مَا جَاءَ عَلَى مَا كَانَ يَأْكُلُ رَسُولُ اللَّهِ صلى الله عليه وسلم
Unreviewed translation. All hadiths in this collection are available in five languages. Titles and introductions may remain in Arabic.
Muhammad ibn Bashshar narrated to us: Mu‘adh ibn Hisham narrated to me: my father narrated to me, from Yunus, from Qatadah, from Anas, who said: The Messenger of Allah (peace and blessings be upon him) never ate at a dining tray, nor from a small bowl, and thin bread was never baked for him. He [Yunus] said: I asked Qatadah, ‘Then what did they eat on?’ He replied, ‘On these travel mats.’ Abu ‘Isa said: This hadith is hasan gharīb (good, though rare). Muhammad ibn Bashshar said: This Yunus is Yunus al-Iskaf. ‘Abd al-Warith ibn Sa‘id also reported something similar from Sa‘id ibn Abi ‘Arubah, from Qatadah, from Anas, from the Prophet (peace and blessings be upon him).
Notes and open questions — unreviewed
The source uses the plural ‘these travel mats’ (al-sufar); it does not specify their material in this sentence.
حَدَّثَنَا مُحَمَّدُ بْنُ بَشَّارٍ،
The English witness omits the opening transmitters and shortens the main chain.
Should the witness preserve the complete chain?
وَقَدْ رَوَى عَبْدُ الْوَارِثِ بْنُ سَعِيدٍ عَنْ سَعِيدِ بْنِ أَبِي عَرُوبَةَ عَنْ قَتَادَةَ عَنْ أَنَسٍ عَنِ النَّبِيِّ صلى الله عليه وسلم نَحْوَهُ .
The Arabic says ‘something similar’ (nahwah), rather than asserting an identical wording.
Should the witness retain the source's qualified ‘something similar’?
Chapter 2
مَا جَاءَ فِي أَكْلِ الأَرْنَبِ
Unreviewed translation. All hadiths in this collection are available in five languages. Titles and introductions may remain in Arabic.
Mahmud ibn Ghaylan narrated to us: Abu Dawud narrated to us: Shu‘bah informed us, from Hisham ibn Zayd ibn Anas, who said: I heard Anas say: We flushed a rabbit out at Marr al-Zahran. The Prophet’s Companions ran after it, and I caught up with it and seized it. I brought it to Abu Talhah, who slaughtered it with a flint stone. He sent its thigh—or its hip—with me to the Prophet (peace and blessings be upon him), and he ate it. I [Hisham] asked, ‘Did he eat it?’ Anas replied, ‘He accepted it.’
Abu ‘Isa said: There are reports on this topic from Jabir, ‘Ammar, and Muhammad ibn Safwan; the latter is also said to be Muhammad ibn Sayfi. This hadith is hasan sahih (good and authentic). Most scholars act on this and see no harm in eating rabbit. Some scholars disliked eating rabbit, saying that it menstruates.
Notes and open questions — unreviewed
The source says Anas sent the rabbit's thigh or hip (fakhidhaha aw warikaha), preserving the narrator's uncertainty. Marwah is a flint stone used for slaughtering.
قَالَ أَبُو عِيسَى وَفِي الْبَابِ عَنْ جَابِرٍ وَعَمَّارٍ وَمُحَمَّدِ بْنِ صَفْوَانَ وَيُقَالُ مُحَمَّدُ بْنُ صَيْفِيٍّ .
The Arabic name is Jabir (جابر), not Jubair; it also says Muhammad ibn Safwan is also called Muhammad ibn Sayfi.
Should the witness correct the name to Jabir and clarify the variant name?
حَدَّثَنَا مَحْمُودُ بْنُ غَيْلاَنَ،
The witness omits the opening transmitters and shortens Hisham ibn Zayd ibn Anas's name.
Should the English witness include the full chain and name?
Chapter 3
مَا جَاءَ فِي أَكْلِ الضَّبِّ
Unreviewed translation. All hadiths in this collection are available in five languages. Titles and introductions may remain in Arabic.
Qutaybah narrated to us: Malik ibn Anas narrated to us, from ‘Abd Allah ibn Dinar, from Ibn ‘Umar, that the Prophet (peace and blessings be upon him) was asked about eating dabb (the desert lizard, often called a mastigure) and said: ‘I do not eat it, nor do I declare it forbidden.’ Reports on this topic also come from ‘Umar, Abu Sa‘id, Ibn ‘Abbas, Thabit ibn Wadi‘ah, Jabir, and ‘Abd al-Rahman ibn Hasanah. Abu ‘Isa said: This hadith is hasan sahih (good and authentic).
Scholars differed about eating dabb. Some scholars among the Prophet’s Companions and others allowed it, while some disliked it. It is reported from Ibn ‘Abbas that he said: ‘Dabb was eaten at the Messenger of Allah’s table; the Messenger of Allah left it only because he found it distasteful.’
Notes and open questions — unreviewed
The Arabic names dabb; ‘mastigure’ is the English witness's zoological rendering. ‘Left it because he found it distasteful’ describes personal aversion, not a prohibition.
حَدَّثَنَا قُتَيْبَةُ،
The English witness omits the chain from Qutaybah through Malik and ‘Abd Allah ibn Dinar.
Should the witness include the full chain?
Chapter 4
مَا جَاءَ فِي أَكْلِ الضَّبُعِ
Unreviewed translation. All hadiths in this collection are available in five languages. Titles and introductions may remain in Arabic.
Ahmad ibn Mani‘ narrated to us: Isma‘il ibn Ibrahim narrated to us: Ibn Jurayj informed us, from ‘Abd Allah ibn ‘Ubayd ibn ‘Umayr, from Ibn Abi ‘Ammar, who said: I asked Jabir, ‘Is the hyena considered game?’ He said, ‘Yes.’ I asked, ‘May I eat it?’ He said, ‘Yes.’ I asked him, ‘Did the Messenger of Allah (peace and blessings be upon him) say so?’ He replied, ‘Yes.’ Abu ‘Isa said: This hadith is hasan sahih (good and authentic). Some scholars held this view and saw no harm in eating hyena; this is the view of Ahmad and Ishaq. A report from the Prophet disapproving of eating hyena has also been transmitted, but its chain is not strong. Some scholars disliked eating hyena; this is the view of Ibn al-Mubarak. Yahya al-Qattan said: Jarir ibn Hazim reported this hadith from ‘Abd Allah ibn ‘Ubayd ibn ‘Umayr, from Ibn Abi ‘Ammar, from Jabir, from ‘Umar, as a statement of ‘Umar. The report of Ibn Jurayj is more sound. Ibn Abi ‘Ammar is ‘Abd al-Rahman ibn ‘Abd Allah ibn Abi ‘Ammar al-Makki.
Notes and open questions — unreviewed
The Arabic word is al-dab‘ (hyena), not al-dabb (the desert lizard) or a badger.
قَالَ قُلْتُ لِجَابِرٍ الضَّبُعُ صَيْدٌ هِيَ قَالَ نَعَمْ .
The Arabic has الضبع (hyena), while the witness repeatedly identifies the animal as a badger.
Should every occurrence of ‘badger’ in the witness be corrected to ‘hyena’?
حَدَّثَنَا أَحْمَدُ بْنُ مَنِيعٍ،
The witness omits the chain from Ahmad ibn Mani‘ through Ibn Jurayj and ‘Abd Allah ibn ‘Ubayd ibn ‘Umayr.
Should the English witness include the complete chain?
Unreviewed translation. All hadiths in this collection are available in five languages. Titles and introductions may remain in Arabic.
Hannad narrated to us: Abu Mu‘awiyah narrated to us, from Isma‘il ibn Muslim, from ‘Abd al-Karim ibn Abi al-Mukharriq, Abu Umayyah, from Hibban ibn Jaz’, from his brother Khuzaymah ibn Jaz’, who said: I asked the Messenger of Allah (peace and blessings be upon him) about eating hyena. He said: ‘Would anyone eat hyena?’ I asked him about eating wolf, and he said: ‘Would anyone with goodness in him eat wolf?’ Abu ‘Isa said: This hadith’s chain is not strong. We know it only through the report of Isma‘il ibn Muslim from ‘Abd al-Karim Abu Umayyah. Some hadith scholars criticized Isma‘il and ‘Abd al-Karim Abu Umayyah, who is ‘Abd al-Karim ibn Qays ibn Abi al-Mukharriq. ‘Abd al-Karim ibn Malik al-Jazari, however, is trustworthy.
Notes and open questions — unreviewed
The Arabic distinguishes ‘Abd al-Karim Abu Umayyah (also identified as ibn Qays ibn Abi al-Mukharriq) from ‘Abd al-Karim ibn Malik al-Jazari, whom it calls trustworthy.
خُزَيْمَةَ بْنِ جَزْءٍ قَالَ سَأَلْتُ رَسُولَ اللَّهِ صلى الله عليه وسلم عَنْ أَكْلِ الضَّبُعِ فَقَالَ " أَوَيَأْكُلُ الضَّبُعَ أَحَدٌ " .
The Arabic has الضبع (hyena), while the English witness says badger. The same animal name occurs again in the source's question.
Should ‘badger’ be corrected to ‘hyena’ in both places?
حَدَّثَنَا هَنَّادٌ،
The English witness omits the chain through Hannad, Abu Mu‘awiyah, Isma‘il ibn Muslim, ‘Abd al-Karim, and Hibban ibn Jaz‘.
Should the witness include the complete chain?
Chapter 5
مَا جَاءَ فِي أَكْلِ لُحُومِ الْخَيْلِ
Unreviewed translation. All hadiths in this collection are available in five languages. Titles and introductions may remain in Arabic.
Qutaybah and Nasr ibn ‘Ali both narrated to us: Sufyan narrated to us, from ‘Amr ibn Dinar, from Jabir, who said: The Messenger of Allah (peace and blessings be upon him) fed us horse meat and forbade us from eating donkey meat. There is also a report on this topic from Asma’ bint Abi Bakr. Abu ‘Isa said: This hadith is hasan sahih (good and authentic). More than one narrator reported it from ‘Amr ibn Dinar, from Jabir, in this way. Hammad ibn Zayd reported it from ‘Amr ibn Dinar, from Muhammad ibn ‘Ali, from Jabir; the report of Ibn ‘Uyaynah is more sound. He said: I heard Muhammad say, ‘Sufyan ibn ‘Uyaynah has a better memory than Hammad ibn Zayd.’
Notes and open questions — unreviewed
The Arabic verb means that the Messenger fed them horse meat; the English witness says he ‘allowed’ them, which makes the statement sound like a legal ruling rather than a report of being fed.
قَالَ أَطْعَمَنَا رَسُولُ اللَّهِ صلى الله عليه وسلم لُحُومَ الْخَيْلِ وَنَهَانَا عَنْ لُحُومِ الْحُمُرِ .
The Arabic says ‘fed us horse meat’ (at‘amana), not ‘allowed us to eat it’.
Should the witness be corrected to preserve the report's wording rather than turn it into an explicit legal permission?
حَدَّثَنَا قُتَيْبَةُ،
The English witness omits both Qutaybah and Nasr ibn ‘Ali from the opening chain.
Should the complete chain be included?
Chapter 6
مَا جَاءَ فِي لُحُومِ الْحُمُرِ الأَهْلِيَّةِ
Unreviewed translation. All hadiths in this collection are available in five languages. Titles and introductions may remain in Arabic.
Muhammad ibn Bashshar narrated to us: ‘Abd al-Wahhab al-Thaqafi narrated to us, from Yahya ibn Sa‘id al-Ansari, from Malik ibn Anas, from al-Zuhri. (Another route:) Ibn Abi ‘Umar narrated to us: Sufyan ibn ‘Uyaynah narrated to us, from al-Zuhri, from ‘Abd Allah and al-Hasan, the two sons of Muhammad ibn ‘Ali, from their father, from ‘Ali, who said: The Messenger of Allah (peace and blessings be upon him) forbade temporary marriage with women during the time of Khaybar and the meat of domesticated donkeys.
Notes and open questions — unreviewed
The Arabic gives a first route ending at al-Zuhri, then introduces another route through al-Zuhri to ‘Abd Allah and al-Hasan and their father. The source as provided does not state further how these routes relate, so both are retained in sequence.
حَدَّثَنَا مُحَمَّدُ بْنُ بَشَّارٍ،
The English witness omits the first route through ‘Abd al-Wahhab al-Thaqafi, Yahya ibn Sa‘id, Malik, and al-Zuhri.
Should the witness preserve both routes?
قَالَ نَهَى رَسُولُ اللَّهِ صلى الله عليه وسلم عَنْ مُتْعَةِ النِّسَاءِ زَمَنَ خَيْبَرَ وَعَنْ لُحُومِ الْحُمُرِ الأَهْلِيَّةِ .
The English witness correctly identifies Khaybar and domesticated donkeys; no grade or compiler commentary is included in the Arabic source block.
No unresolved meaning issue; this note records the witness's scope.
Unreviewed translation. All hadiths in this collection are available in five languages. Titles and introductions may remain in Arabic.
Sa‘id ibn ‘Abd al-Rahman al-Makhzumi narrated to us: Sufyan narrated to us, from al-Zuhri, from ‘Abd Allah and al-Hasan—the two sons of Muhammad ibn al-Hanafiyyah—and he related something similar. ‘Abd Allah ibn Muhammad’s teknonym was Abu Hashim. Al-Zuhri said: ‘Al-Hasan ibn Muhammad was the more acceptable of the two.’ Others besides Sa‘id ibn ‘Abd al-Rahman reported from Ibn ‘Uyaynah that he said: ‘‘Abd Allah ibn Muhammad was the more acceptable of the two.’ Abu ‘Isa said: This hadith is hasan sahih (good and authentic).
Notes and open questions — unreviewed
This is a continuation giving an additional route and a differing assessment of which brother was more acceptable: al-Zuhri favors al-Hasan, while other transmitters from Ibn ‘Uyaynah favor ‘Abd Allah.
حَدَّثَنَا سَعِيدُ بْنُ عَبْدِ الرَّحْمَنِ الْمَخْزُومِيُّ،
The English witness omits the full additional chain and the identification that both men are sons of Muhammad ibn al-Hanafiyyah; it also contains a duplicated name in the final quotation.
Should the witness restore the chain, family identification, and unduplicated name?
Unreviewed translation. All hadiths in this collection are available in five languages. Titles and introductions may remain in Arabic.
Abu Kurayb narrated to us: Husayn ibn ‘Ali al-Ju‘fi narrated to us, from Za’idah, from Muhammad ibn ‘Amr, from Abu Salamah, from Abu Hurayrah, that the Messenger of Allah (peace and blessings be upon him) declared unlawful on the day of Khaybar every predatory animal with fangs, al-mujaththamah (an animal tied up as a target and killed), and the domesticated donkey. Reports on this topic also come from ‘Ali, Jabir, al-Bara’, Ibn Abi Awfa, Anas, al-‘Irbad ibn Sariyah, Abu Tha‘labah, Ibn ‘Umar, and Abu Sa‘id. Abu ‘Isa said: This hadith is hasan sahih (good and authentic). ‘Abd al-‘Aziz ibn Muhammad and others also reported this hadith from Muhammad ibn ‘Amr, but they mentioned only one phrase: ‘The Messenger of Allah (peace and blessings be upon him) forbade every predatory animal with fangs.’
Notes and open questions — unreviewed
The main wording uses a verb meaning ‘declared unlawful’; the final variant uses ‘forbade’. The rare term al-mujaththamah is retained with a brief explanatory gloss.
حَدَّثَنَا أَبُو كُرَيْبٍ،
The English witness omits the chain from Abu Kurayb through Abu Salamah.
Should the witness include the complete chain?
Chapter 7
مَا جَاءَ فِي الأَكْلِ فِي آنِيَةِ الْكُفَّارِ
Unreviewed translation. All hadiths in this collection are available in five languages. Titles and introductions may remain in Arabic.
Zayd ibn Akhzam al-Ta’i narrated to us: Salm ibn Qutaybah narrated to us: Shu‘bah narrated to us, from Ayyub, from Abu Qilabah, from Abu Tha‘labah, who said: The Messenger of Allah (peace and blessings be upon him) was asked about the cooking pots of the Magians. He said: ‘Wash them thoroughly, then cook in them.’ He also forbade every predatory animal with fangs. Abu ‘Isa said: This is a well-known hadith from Abu Tha‘labah, and it has been reported from him by routes other than this one. Abu Tha‘labah’s name was Jurthum; it is also said Jurhum, and it is also said Nashib. This hadith has also been cited through Abu Qilabah, from Abu Asma’ al-Rahabi, from Abu Tha‘labah.
Notes and open questions — unreviewed
The Arabic gives three reported forms of Abu Tha‘labah's name; they are retained as variants rather than harmonized.
حَدَّثَنَا زَيْدُ بْنُ أَخْزَمَ الطَّائِيُّ،
The English witness omits the full chain, including Zayd ibn Akhzam, Salm ibn Qutaybah, Shu‘bah, and Ayyub.
Should the English witness include the full chain?
Unreviewed translation. All hadiths in this collection are available in five languages. Titles and introductions may remain in Arabic.
‘Ali ibn ‘Isa ibn Yazid al-Baghdadi narrated to us: ‘Ubayd Allah ibn Muhammad al-‘Aishi narrated to us: Hammad ibn Salamah narrated to us, from Ayyub and Qatadah, from Abu Qilabah, from Abu Asma’ al-Rahabi, from Abu Tha‘labah al-Khushani, who said: I said, ‘Messenger of Allah, we live in a land of the People of the Book, and we cook in their pots and drink from their vessels.’ The Messenger of Allah (peace and blessings be upon him) said: ‘If you cannot find other vessels, wash them with water.’ Then I said, ‘Messenger of Allah, we live in a land where game is plentiful, so what should we do?’ He said: ‘When you send your trained hunting dog and mention Allah’s name, and it kills the game, eat it. If it is untrained but you slaughter the game properly, eat it. And when you shoot with your arrow, mention Allah’s name; if it kills the game, eat it.’ Abu ‘Isa said: This hadith is hasan sahih (good and authentic).
Notes and open questions — unreviewed
The source includes a separate ruling for game caught by an untrained dog, provided it is then properly slaughtered; this clause is absent from the English witness.
ثُمَّ قَالَ يَا رَسُولَ اللَّهِ إِنَّا بِأَرْضِ صَيْدٍ فَكَيْفَ نَصْنَعُ قَالَ " إِذَا أَرْسَلْتَ كَلْبَكَ الْمُكَلَّبَ وَذَكَرْتَ اسْمَ اللَّهِ فَقَتَلَ فَكُلْ وَإِنْ كَانَ غَيْرَ مُكَلَّبٍ فَذُكِّيَ فَكُلْ وَإِذَا رَمَيْتَ بِسَهْمِكَ وَذَكَرْتَ اسْمَ اللَّهِ فَقَتَلَ فَكُلْ " .
The English witness omits the clause about an untrained dog whose catch is properly slaughtered.
Should the missing untrained-dog condition be restored in the witness?
حَدَّثَنَا عَلِيُّ بْنُ عِيسَى بْنِ يَزِيدَ الْبَغْدَادِيُّ،
The English witness omits the full chain through ‘Ali ibn ‘Isa, ‘Ubayd Allah ibn Muhammad, Hammad ibn Salamah, Ayyub, Qatadah, Abu Qilabah, and Abu Asma’.
Should the complete chain be included?
Chapter 8
مَا جَاءَ فِي الْفَأْرَةِ تَمُوتُ فِي السَّمْنِ
Unreviewed translation. All hadiths in this collection are available in five languages. Titles and introductions may remain in Arabic.
Sa‘id ibn ‘Abd al-Rahman al-Makhzumi and Abu ‘Ammar both narrated to us: Sufyan narrated to us, from al-Zuhri, from ‘Ubayd Allah, from Ibn ‘Abbas, from Maymunah, that a mouse fell into ghee and died. The Prophet (peace and blessings be upon him) was asked about it and said: ‘Throw it away, and what is around it, and eat the rest.’ There is also a report on this topic from Abu Hurayrah. Abu ‘Isa said: This hadith is hasan sahih (good and authentic).
This hadith has also been reported from al-Zuhri, from ‘Ubayd Allah, from Ibn ‘Abbas, stating that the Prophet was asked, but without mentioning Maymunah. The report of Ibn ‘Abbas from Maymunah is more sound. Ma‘mar reported something similar from al-Zuhri, from Sa‘id ibn al-Musayyab, from Abu Hurayrah, from the Prophet, but this report is not preserved.
I heard Muhammad ibn Isma‘il say: In Ma‘mar’s report from al-Zuhri, from Sa‘id ibn al-Musayyab, from Abu Hurayrah, from the Prophet, it says that he was asked about it and replied: ‘If the ghee is solid, throw away the mouse and what is around it; if it is liquid, do not go near it.’ Muhammad said: ‘This is an error; Ma‘mar made a mistake in it. The sound report is that of al-Zuhri, from ‘Ubayd Allah, from Ibn ‘Abbas, from Maymunah.’
Notes and open questions — unreviewed
The compiler distinguishes the preferred chain through Maymunah from two variants that omit her or route the report through Abu Hurayrah; the latter version's solid/liquid ruling is explicitly called an error.
حَدَّثَنَا سَعِيدُ بْنُ عَبْدِ الرَّحْمَنِ الْمَخْزُومِيُّ،
The English witness omits the opening transmitters and shortens the complete chain.
Should the English witness include the full chain?
قَالَ وَسَمِعْتُ مُحَمَّدَ بْنَ إِسْمَاعِيلَ يَقُولُ وَحَدِيثُ مَعْمَرٍ عَنِ الزُّهْرِيِّ عَنْ سَعِيدِ بْنِ الْمُسَيَّبِ عَنْ أَبِي هُرَيْرَةَ عَنِ النَّبِيِّ صلى الله عليه وسلم وَذَكَرَ فِيهِ أَنَّهُ سُئِلَ عَنْهُ فَقَالَ " إِذَا كَانَ جَامِدًا فَأَلْقُوهَا وَمَا حَوْلَهَا وَإِنْ كَانَ مَائِعًا فَلاَ تَقْرَبُوهُ " .
This solid/liquid ruling is part of Ma‘mar's variant, which the compiler explicitly says is erroneous; the preferred report is through Ibn ‘Abbas from Maymunah.
Should the witness make the attribution of the disputed wording and the compiler's rejection clearer?
Chapter 9
مَا جَاءَ فِي النَّهْىِ عَنِ الأَكْلِ، وَالشُّرْبِ، بِالشِّمَالِ
Unreviewed translation. All hadiths in this collection are available in five languages. Titles and introductions may remain in Arabic.
Ishaq ibn Mansur informed us: ‘Abd Allah ibn Numayr narrated to us: ‘Ubayd Allah ibn ‘Umar narrated to us, from Ibn Shihab, from Abu Bakr ibn ‘Ubayd Allah ibn ‘Abd Allah ibn ‘Umar, from ‘Abd Allah ibn ‘Umar, that the Prophet (peace and blessings be upon him) said: ‘Let none of you eat with his left hand or drink with his left hand, for Satan eats with his left hand and drinks with his left hand.’ Reports on this topic also come from Jabir, ‘Umar ibn Abi Salamah, Salamah ibn al-Akwa‘, Anas ibn Malik, and Hafsah. Abu ‘Isa said: This hadith is hasan sahih (good and authentic). Malik and Ibn ‘Uyaynah reported it from al-Zuhri, from Abu Bakr ibn ‘Ubayd Allah, from Ibn ‘Umar. Ma‘mar and ‘Uqayl reported it from al-Zuhri, from Salim, from Ibn ‘Umar. The report of Malik and Ibn ‘Uyaynah is more sound.
Notes and open questions — unreviewed
حَدَّثَنَا إِسْحَاقُ بْنُ مَنْصُورٍ،
The English witness omits the chain through Ishaq ibn Mansur, ‘Abd Allah ibn Numayr, ‘Ubayd Allah ibn ‘Umar, and Ibn Shihab.
Should the English witness include the complete chain?
Unreviewed translation. All hadiths in this collection are available in five languages. Titles and introductions may remain in Arabic.
‘Abd Allah ibn ‘Abd al-Rahman narrated to us: Ja‘far ibn ‘Awn narrated to us, from Sa‘id ibn Abi ‘Arubah, from Ma‘mar, from al-Zuhri, from Salim, from his father, that the Messenger of Allah (peace and blessings be upon him) said: ‘When one of you eats, let him eat with his right hand and drink with his right hand, for Satan eats with his left hand and drinks with his left hand.’
Notes and open questions — unreviewed
حَدَّثَنَا عَبْدُ اللَّهِ بْنُ عَبْدِ الرَّحْمَنِ،
The English witness presents al-Zuhri as the narrator heading and omits Ma‘mar and the transmitters before him; in the Arabic, al-Zuhri is one link in a longer chain.
Should the heading be changed to reflect the full chain and avoid treating al-Zuhri as the report's narrator?
Chapter 10
مَا جَاءَ فِي لَعْقِ الأَصَابِعِ بَعْدَ الأَكْلِ
Unreviewed translation. All hadiths in this collection are available in five languages. Titles and introductions may remain in Arabic.
Muhammad ibn ‘Abd al-Malik ibn Abi al-Shawarib narrated to us: ‘Abd al-‘Aziz ibn al-Mukhtar narrated to us, from Suhayl ibn Abi Salih, from his father, from Abu Hurayrah, who said: The Messenger of Allah (peace and blessings be upon him) said: ‘When one of you eats, let him lick his fingers, for he does not know in which of them the blessing lies.’ Reports on this topic also come from Jabir, Ka‘b ibn Malik, and Anas. Abu ‘Isa said: This hadith is hasan gharīb (good, though rare); we know it only by this route, through the report of Suhayl. I asked Muhammad about this hadith, and he said: ‘This is among the reports of ‘Abd al-‘Aziz that are little known; it is known only through his report.’
Notes and open questions — unreviewed
The phrase about ‘Abd al-‘Aziz describes the report as belonging to a little-known or disputed set of transmissions; the English witness paraphrases it as ‘diverse narrations.’
حَدَّثَنَا مُحَمَّدُ بْنُ عَبْدِ الْمَلِكِ بْنِ أَبِي الشَّوَارِبِ،
The English witness omits the chain from Muhammad ibn ‘Abd al-Malik through Suhayl and his father.
Should the witness include the complete chain?
Chapter 11
مَا جَاءَ فِي اللُّقْمَةِ تَسْقُطُ
Unreviewed translation. All hadiths in this collection are available in five languages. Titles and introductions may remain in Arabic.
Qutaybah narrated to us: Ibn Lahi‘ah narrated to us, from Abu al-Zubayr, from Jabir, that the Prophet (peace and blessings be upon him) said: ‘When one of you is eating and a morsel falls, let him remove whatever is objectionable from it, then eat it; let him not leave it for Satan.’ There is also a report on this topic from Anas.
Notes and open questions — unreviewed
The source refers to a single morsel (luqmah). The phrase ‘remove what is objectionable from it’ leaves the specific impurity or debris unspecified, as in the Arabic.
حَدَّثَنَا قُتَيْبَةُ،
The English witness omits the chain from Qutaybah through Ibn Lahi‘ah and Abu al-Zubayr.
Should the full chain be included?
أَنَّ النَّبِيَّ صلى الله عليه وسلم قَالَ " إِذَا أَكَلَ أَحَدُكُمْ طَعَامًا فَسَقَطَتْ لُقْمَةٌ فَلْيُمِطْ مَا رَابَهُ مِنْهَا ثُمَّ لْيَطْعَمْهَا وَلاَ يَدَعْهَا لِلشَّيْطَانِ " .
The Arabic means to remove what is objectionable from the fallen morsel; ‘suspicious’ may suggest uncertainty rather than visible debris or impurity.
Should ‘suspicious’ be revised to a more literal phrase such as ‘whatever is objectionable’?
Unreviewed translation. All hadiths in this collection are available in five languages. Titles and introductions may remain in Arabic.
Al-Hasan ibn ‘Ali al-Khallal narrated to us: ‘Affan ibn Muslim narrated to us: Hammad ibn Salamah narrated to us: Thabit narrated to us, from Anas, that when the Prophet (peace and blessings be upon him) ate, he would lick his three fingers and say: ‘If a morsel of one of you falls, let him remove any filth from it, then eat it, and not leave it for Satan.’ He instructed us to scrape the dish clean, and said: ‘You do not know in which part of your food the blessing lies.’ Abu ‘Isa said: This hadith is hasan sahih (good and authentic).
Notes and open questions — unreviewed
قَالَ أَبُو عِيسَى هَذَا حَدِيثٌ حَسَنٌ صَحِيحٌ .
The Arabic grade here is hasan sahih; gharīb does not appear in this text.
Should the witness's added gharīb be removed?
حَدَّثَنَا الْحَسَنُ بْنُ عَلِيٍّ الْخَلاَّلُ،
The English witness omits the chain from al-Hasan ibn ‘Ali al-Khallal through Thabit.
Should the complete chain be included?
Unreviewed translation. All hadiths in this collection are available in five languages. Titles and introductions may remain in Arabic.
Nasr ibn ‘Ali al-Jahdami narrated to us: Abu al-Yaman al-Mu‘alla ibn Rashid informed us: My grandmother, Umm ‘Asim, narrated to me—she was an umm walad (a slave woman who had borne a child) of Sinan ibn Salamah. She said: Nubaishah al-Khayr came to us while we were eating from a large bowl. He told us that the Messenger of Allah (peace and blessings be upon him) said: ‘Whoever eats from a large bowl and then licks it, the bowl will ask forgiveness for him.’ Abu ‘Isa said: This hadith is gharīb (rare); we know it only through the report of al-Mu‘alla ibn Rashid. Yazid ibn Harun and more than one of the leading scholars also reported this hadith from al-Mu‘alla ibn Rashid.
Notes and open questions — unreviewed
Umm walad is retained with a short gloss to clarify the biographical relationship stated in the Arabic.
حَدَّثَنَا نَصْرُ بْنُ عَلِيٍّ الْجَهْضَمِيُّ،
The English witness omits the opening chain through Nasr ibn ‘Ali and Abu al-Yaman.
Should the complete chain be included?
Chapter 12
مَا جَاءَ فِي كَرَاهِيَةِ الأَكْلِ مِنْ وَسَطِ الطَّعَامِ
Unreviewed translation. All hadiths in this collection are available in five languages. Titles and introductions may remain in Arabic.
Qutaybah, Abu Raja’, narrated to us: Jarir narrated to us, from ‘Ata’ ibn al-Sa’ib, from Sa‘id ibn Jubayr, from Ibn ‘Abbas, that the Prophet (peace and blessings be upon him) said: ‘Blessing descends in the middle of the food, so eat from its edges and do not eat from its middle.’ Abu ‘Isa said: This hadith is hasan sahih (good and authentic); it is known only through the report of ‘Ata’ ibn al-Sa’ib. Shu‘bah and al-Thawri also reported it from ‘Ata’ ibn al-Sa’ib. There is also a report on this topic from Ibn ‘Umar.
Notes and open questions — unreviewed
حَدَّثَنَا قُتَيْبَةُ أَبُو رَجَاءٍ،
The English witness omits the chain through Qutaybah, Jarir, ‘Ata’ ibn al-Sa’ib, and Sa‘id ibn Jubayr.
Should the full chain be included?
Chapter 13
مَا جَاءَ فِي كَرَاهِيَةِ أَكْلِ الثُّومِ وَالْبَصَلِ
Unreviewed translation. All hadiths in this collection are available in five languages. Titles and introductions may remain in Arabic.
Ishaq ibn Mansur informed us: Yahya ibn Sa‘id al-Qattan informed us, from Ibn Jurayj, who narrated to us: ‘Ata’ narrated to us, from Jabir, who said: The Messenger of Allah (peace and blessings be upon him) said: ‘Whoever eats any of these—’ The first time he said garlic; then he specified: ‘garlic, onion, and leek—let him not approach us in our mosques.’ Abu ‘Isa said: This hadith is hasan sahih (good and authentic). Reports on this topic also come from ‘Umar, Abu Ayyub, Abu Hurayrah, Abu Sa‘id, Jabir ibn Samurah, Qurrah ibn Iyas al-Muzani, and Ibn ‘Umar.
Notes and open questions — unreviewed
The Arabic records the speaker's clarification: first he said ‘garlic’, then specified garlic, onion, and leek. The plural ‘our mosques’ is retained.
حَدَّثَنَا إِسْحَاقُ بْنُ مَنْصُورٍ،
The English witness omits the chain through Ishaq ibn Mansur, Yahya al-Qattan, Ibn Jurayj, and ‘Ata’.
Should the full chain be included?